Coty wins imitation fragrance case against Excell Brands

By Deanna Utroske contact

- Last updated on GMT

Coty wins imitation fragrance case against Excell Brands
The beauty maker first filed its trademark infringement complaint in September of 2015 and only this month has the judge issued a ruling.

The case was heard in New York District Court by Judge Jesse Matthew Furman, as Coty Inc. v. Excell Brands, LLC (1:15-cv-07029-JMF).

Coty held that Excell Brands was packaging and marketing copycat fragrances that would confuse consumers and diminish the value of Coty’s fragrance products.  

Bogus

In Judge Furman’s 30 some - page ruling, he notes that when compared to Coty, “Excell's business model is, to put it mildly, a bit different. Until December 2016, Excell concededly manufactured and distributed knockoff fragrances.” ​And the judgement goes onto outline how Excell admittedly went about doing so. The company selected a fragrance with a high price point and one that would “be understood by its customer base of `lower income, sometimes ethnic customers'.” ​[Excell's description]

The company then selected a name and packaging that emulated the original and advised its suppliers on the general characteristics of the scent. “Before a fragrance went into production,”​ explains the judge,”Excell typically reviewed, revised, and approved the bottle, box, and juice. Indeed, the company frequently made changes to the products so that the packaging of its knockoffs would more closely resemble Coty's original branded fragrances.”

Justice

Judge Furman’s ruling awards Coty $6.5m in damages and orders Excell to stop selling any fragrances that imitate Coty’s. Though interestingly that latter win is of little importance now, since “Excell shut down its business operations and ceased selling its fragrances in December 2016,” ​as the ruling notes.

For Coty the case went well, but not as well as the beauty maker had hoped.   Coty “did not get everything it asked for,” ​as TheFashionLaw.com reports. “The court declined to grant an enhanced monetary award for counterfeit products, holding that more than ‘mere similarity’ or ‘colorable imitation’ is necessary for counterfeiting remedies.”

And, the site notes, “the court did not award attorneys’ fees to Coty, even though it had determined that Excell had acted in bad faith.”

Undeterred

The threat of unfair competition doesn’t seem to have lessened Coty’s interest in the prestige fragrance business. Just this month the company completed a deal to acquire the license to Burberry fragrance (as well as cosmetics and skin care), as Cosmetics Design reported​.

Both Coty and the fashion brand are eager to move forward and grow the brand’s beauty business. As Burberry CEO Marco Gobbetti explains, “Following months of hard work to ensure a smooth transition, we are pleased that this strategic partnership, which brings together tremendous beauty experience and expertise, has begun.”

Related topics: Regulation & Safety, Fragrance, Packaging

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Powders to packaging: cosmetic quality control

Powders to packaging: cosmetic quality control

Stable Micro Systems | 20-Nov-2017 | Technical / White Paper

Physical analysis is vital at every step of development for cosmetic products, from perfecting the consistency of creams, to ensuring gels glide on – and...

Sustainability: Ingredient Integrity & Impact

Sustainability: Ingredient Integrity & Impact

Croda Europe Ltd | 06-Nov-2017 | Research Study

The drive for transparency on sustainability programmes is putting increased pressures on the chemical industry to develop robust well-rounded initiatives....

Ithos Ingredient Screening PDF Snapshot

Meet Compliance with Ithos Ingredient Screening

Ithos Global, Inc. | 18-Sep-2017 | Product Brochure

View how Ithos Ingredient Screening lets companies see where their formula ingredients are compliant, restricted or prohibited. With nearly 60 countries...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more

Webinars