$10 million Suave hair loss settlement back in court

By Deanna Utroske contact

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags: Suave professionals keratin, Class action

$10 million Suave hair loss settlement back in court
Unilever faced multiple class action suits when consumers using a Suave Professional product reported hair loss and scalp burns. Late last week the Seventh Circuit decided on an appeal from class members dissatisfied with the initial outcome.

The product in question is Unilever USA’s Suave Professionals Keratin Infusion 30 Day Smoothing Kit, which the company recalled in 2012.

“Unfortunately, for some consumers, the Smoothing Kit was a disaster. Its active ingredient, thioglycolic  acid, is extremely corrosive, and if left on long enough, can dissolve the hair and burn the scalp,” ​explains the court in its decision.

Several class actions were filed against the company, claiming breach of warranty, violations of state consumer fraud, violations of deceptive practices law, and unjust enrichment.

Backstory

The cases were consolidated and went into mediation until February 2014, when a settlement was reached.

As noted in this latest decision in the case, the original settlement saw “Unilever USA agree to create two settlement funds: a Reimbursement Fund of $250,000, and an Injury Fund of $10,000,000, for a total of $10,250,000.”

Objection

Tina Martin, the named class objector‐appellant, gave 11 reasons for opposing the settlement. In its decision, the Seventh Circuit distilled them further as:

  • the strength of the class’s case
  • the complexity and expense of further litigation
  • the amount of opposition
  • the reaction of class members to the settlement
  • the opinion of competent counsel
  • the stage of the proceedings
  • the amount of discovery that was completed

Outcome

None of these were sufficient to invalidate the settlement: “We conclude that the district court properly approved the settlement agreement reached in this case, and we thus affirm its judgment,” ​writes the court.

The decision to uphold the original Suave settlement is something of a win for the personal care industry, with several companies not faring so well in the legal arena lately. Oldspice is facing a suit​ from consumers alleging allergic reactions. EOS just settled an allergy-related suit​ with the stipulation that the company enhance product labels.

Avon settled an IP dispute with beautyblender​ over sponge applicator tool sales and marketing. And, of course J&J lost an important suit linking talc to cancer​. 

Related topics: Regulation & Safety, Hair Care

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Readily Biodegradable, Nature Derived thickener

Readily Biodegradable, Nature Derived thickener

Cargill Beauty | 01-Sep-2021 | Product Brochure

Cargill Beauty can help to create more sustainable hair care formulations with our 100% nature derived (according to ISO 16128) and readily biodegradable...

FIBER DTOX: ANTI-POLLUTION ACTIVE FOR HAIR

FIBER DTOX: ANTI-POLLUTION ACTIVE FOR HAIR

ASSESSA | 30-Aug-2021 | Product Brochure

FIBER DTOX is an active ingredient designed to prevent the accumulation and to remove heavy metals and other toxins adsorbed on the surface of the hair....

Kickstart your Digital Makeover with PLM

Kickstart your Digital Makeover with PLM

Centric Software® | 04-Aug-2021 | Application Note

Digital Transformation is key for cosmetics and personal care brands, manufacturers and retailers looking to keep up with evolving market challenges and...

Localizing Your Supply Chain

Localizing Your Supply Chain

Oracle NetSuite | 13-Jul-2021 | Technical / White Paper

Building resilience requires establishing relationships with multiple suppliers and manufacturers. It also requires complete visibility into the source...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars