Judge rules that organic food standards do not apply to cosmetics


- Last updated on GMT

Judge rules that organic food standards do not apply to cosmetics

Related tags Organic food

A Californian Judge has refused to toss out the ongoing lawsuit against Kiss My Face for falsely labeling a product line as “organic.”

Californian U.S. District Judge John A. Houston denied Kiss My Face’s motion to dismiss the suit, which was made on the argument that enforcing the requirements of the US Department of Agriculture could not be carried out through a private course of action.  

Kiss My Face also claim that letting the suit stand might impose a conflicting set of standards.

However, Judge Houston found that the standards of the Organic Foods Production Act did not apply to cosmetics and beauty products.

 “The ordinary meaning of ‘human consumption’ includes food but does not include cosmetic products. Only defendant’s inflated definition of agricultural products attempts to clothe cosmetics within the rubric of the OFPA,”​ he stated in an order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss.

The cosmetics company was sued last year by plaintif Matthew Dronkers, who alleged that the firm’s labeling of a particular product line as “obsessively organic” ​constituted misrepresentation.

Motion to dismiss

Kiss My Face’s request for dismissal was based on the claim that the plaintiff’s claim went against the federal Organic Foods Production Act, which specifies that labeling requirements cannot be enforced through a private cause of action.

They also claimed that the suit could impose a potentially conflicting set of standards because the USDA’s National Organic Standards Board had recommended that NOP standard cover personal care products.  

However, this view was firmly rejected along with the motion to dismiss.

Judge Houston commented: “As noted by Plaintiff, there is no statement regarding any congressional attempt to preempt state labeling requirements for cosmetics. In fact, the language of the statute suggests that the OFPA is limited to food.”

“While the complaint cites to the NOP compositional requirement for guidance as to a definition of organic, the claims do not seek to enforce NOP products as to “agricultural products but instead seeks relief under California’s unfair competition, false advertising laws and the CLRA based upon Defendant’s claims that its products are organic when they are not.”

He also noted that the USDA had not taken any formal steps towards including cosmetic products under NOP regulations.

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Innovation Sensations: The New Roaring Twenties

Innovation Sensations: The New Roaring Twenties

Accupac | 01-Mar-2023 | Technical / White Paper

It may be difficult to envision a post-pandemic consumer market, but beauty care is poised to experience a surge of growth and innovation not seen in some...

Breaking Into Darker Skin Cosmetics

Breaking Into Darker Skin Cosmetics

Tagra Biotechnologies | 21-Feb-2023 | Product Brochure

DeeperCaps™ provide increased formula stability for cosmetic manufacturers. The innovative microencapsulation technology prevents pigment mixing and capsules...

Gentle skin exfoliation with Glucono-delta-Lactone

Gentle skin exfoliation with Glucono-delta-Lactone

Jungbunzlauer | 14-Nov-2022 | Clinical Study

Jungbunzlauer’s glucono-delta-lactone (GdL) is a polyhydroxy acid known as a mild, effective exfoliating agent. Its beneficial impact was proven in a four-week...

Related suppliers

Follow us


View more